bci-public-protocol-annex-minimal-disclosure-v1
/ Governance & Protocol Framework / By

BCI Public Protocol Annex – Minimal Disclosure Version

 

Version: PP-A v1.0
Applicable to: Category B Structural Attribution Reports

 

 

This Annex constitutes a public methodological boundary reference and should be read in conjunction with the BCI Independence & Conflict Policy and Institutional Methodology Disclosure.

 

 

I. PURPOSE OF DISCLOSURE

This Annex provides a minimal public disclosure framework for the BCI Structural Integrity Protocol.


Its purpose is to establish methodological transparency without compromising proprietary calibration architecture.

 

This document does not disclose full weighting coefficients, sectoral adjustment matrices, or internal simulation engines.

 

 

II. MODEL ARCHITECTURE OVERVIEW

BCI Structural Integrity Protocol evaluates intangible asset durability through a four-dimensional structural model:

  1. Meaning Tension (MT)
    Measures symbolic gravity, narrative defensibility, and pricing sovereignty.
  2. Perceptual Legibility (PL)
    Measures cognitive accessibility, code diffusion efficiency, and semantic scalability.
  3. Temporal Structure (TSⁿ)
    Measures compounding durability, intergenerational persistence, and decay resistance.
  4. Energy State (ES)
    Measures symbolic-to-transactional conversion efficiency and capital exchange velocity.

The model operates as a structural ratio system in which numerator variables (MT, TSⁿ) represent sovereignty accumulation, while denominator variables (PL, ES⁻¹) represent entropy and exchange friction.

 

Full mathematical configuration remains proprietary.

 

 

III. VARIABLE CALIBRATION PRINCIPLES

All variables are calibrated according to the following institutional standards:

  1. Cross-Brand Normalization
    All readings are sector-normalized within peer-defined asset classes.
  2. Cross-Cycle Adjustment
    Macroeconomic distortion factors are smoothed via volatility band correction.
  3. Multi-Source Data Aggregation
    Data inputs may include:
    • Public financial disclosures (segment-level)
    • Secondary market resale spread tracking
    • Narrative density indexing
    • Cultural reference persistence mapping
    • Digital diffusion velocity indicators
  4. Error Margin Protocol
    All published BCI readings are presented with a 95% confidence band derived from:Input variance range；Historical volatility baseline；Sector beta sensitivity stress test

     

    IV. SCORING DISCIPLINE

    BCI scores are not ordinal rankings but structural condition readings.

     

    Score Interpretation Bands (Luxury Hard Asset Sector Reference):

    9.0+ Structural Apex (Sovereignty Dominant)
    8.5–8.9 High Integrity / Defensive Premium
    8.0–8.4 Stable Sovereign / Efficiency Constraint
    7.5–7.9 Transitional / Friction Emerging
    <7.5 Structural Dilution Risk

     

    Scores reflect structural configuration at time of data cut-off and do not imply forward financial performance.

     

     

    V. HISTORICAL ANCHOR INDEX METHODOLOGY 

    When referenced, the Historical Anchor Strength Index is derived from:

    • Verified historical continuity length
    • Archival citation density
    • Auction resale stability metrics
    • Cultural cross-reference frequency
    • Institutional recognition weight (museum, academic reference)

    Detailed coefficient weighting remains proprietary.

     

     

    VI. SCENARIO SIMULATION FRAMEWORK

    Scenario modeling is constructed using:

    1. Parameter Shift Simulation
      Controlled adjustment of MT/PL ratio bands.
    2. Conversion Elasticity Overlay
      ES sensitivity to legibility expansion or contraction.
    3. Sovereignty Dilution Stress Test
      Measures the threshold at which MT decay exceeds recovery capacity.

    Scenarios are probabilistic structural simulations.
    They are not forecasts, valuations, or strategic prescriptions.

     

     

    VII. GOVERNANCE MONITORING LOGIC

    BCI monitoring recommendations follow three principles:

    1. Ratio Integrity Monitoring
      Structural health depends on the relative balance between numerator and denominator variables.
    2. Threshold Discipline
      Alerts are triggered when:
      • Conversion velocity deviates materially from the sector-adjusted baseline
      • Entry-line mix exceeds peer-adjusted tolerance band
      • Narrative concentration exceeds diffusion elasticity

    Exact thresholds are engagement-specific and not publicly disclosed.

     

     

    VIII. INDEPENDENCE & DATA ETHICS

    BCI Lab operates under the following safeguards:

    • No asset-level compensation linkage
    • No brand-funded calibration adjustments
    • No retroactive score alteration without a formal amendment notice

    All revisions are version-controlled and archived.

     

     

    IX. LIMITATION OF SCOPE

    BCI Structural Attribution Reports:

    • Are not credit ratings
    • Are not fairness opinions
    • Do not constitute investment advice
    • Do not replace the statutory financial audit

    They provide structural diagnostics of intangible asset configuration.

     

     

    X. VERSION CONTROL

    Current Public Annex Version: PP-A v1.0
    Effective Date: 2026.02
    Next Scheduled Review: 2026.Q4

    All updates will be logged with change identifiers.

     

    END OF ANNEX

    Related Posts

    Scroll to Top